<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tewha &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tewha.net/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tewha.net</link>
	<description>Links and writings on software development, mostly for iPhone and Mac OS X.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:08:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>McAfee experiment: Sex life unchanged, but inbox bulging</title>
		<link>http://tewha.net/2008/07/mcafee-experiment-sex-life-unchanged-but-inbox-bulging/</link>
		<comments>http://tewha.net/2008/07/mcafee-experiment-sex-life-unchanged-but-inbox-bulging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spammers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tewha.net/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting Ars Technica article on spam: From April 1 to May 1, McAfee ran an experiment with 50 volunteers designed to measure just how much spam a person would receive if they actually registered at all the sites that request &#8230; <a href="http://tewha.net/2008/07/mcafee-experiment-sex-life-unchanged-but-inbox-bulging/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080701-amonth-of-spam-no-help-for-sex-life-but-enlarges-the-inbox.html">Ars Technica</a> article on spam:</p>
<blockquote><p>From April 1 to May 1, McAfee ran an experiment with 50 volunteers designed to measure just how much spam a person would receive if they actually registered at all the sites that request your e-mail address. The total amount of spam that comes flooding down the system is almost awe-inspiring.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tewha.net/2008/07/mcafee-experiment-sex-life-unchanged-but-inbox-bulging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spammers getting more clever?</title>
		<link>http://tewha.net/2007/12/spammers-getting-more-clever/</link>
		<comments>http://tewha.net/2007/12/spammers-getting-more-clever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[akimset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyile.com/2007/12/spammers-getting-more-clever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think spammers may be getting more clever1. For the first time in a year, I got two pieces of spam this morning. I&#8217;ve had one more since. If this continues, I&#8217;m going to have to turn on more options &#8230; <a href="http://tewha.net/2007/12/spammers-getting-more-clever/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think spammers may be getting more clever<sup><a href="http://tewha.net/2007/12/spammers-getting-more-clever/#footnote_0_402" id="identifier_0_402" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="This is clever in the clever monkeys sense. But not more intelligent, obviously.">1</a></sup>. For the first time in a year, I got two pieces of spam this morning. I&#8217;ve had one more since. If this continues, I&#8217;m going to have to turn on more options than just Akimset.</p>
<p>Or maybe spammers just really like posts that mention Indiana Jones.</p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_402" class="footnote">This is clever in the <a href="http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20030316.html">clever monkeys</a> sense. But not more intelligent, obviously.</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tewha.net/2007/12/spammers-getting-more-clever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acorn vs Pixelmator: Do they spam?</title>
		<link>http://tewha.net/2007/11/acorn-vs-pixelmator-do-they-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://tewha.net/2007/11/acorn-vs-pixelmator-do-they-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixelmator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyile.com/2007/11/acorn-vs-pixelmator-do-they-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one category nobody&#8217;s talked about when comparing Acorn and Pixelmator: Will the company spam you? So far, I&#8217;ve been spammed by Pixelmator&#8217;s partners twice. I posted to their support board asking them if they were aware of this, and &#8230; <a href="http://tewha.net/2007/11/acorn-vs-pixelmator-do-they-spam/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one category nobody&#8217;s talked about when comparing <a href="http://flyingmeat.com/acorn/">Acorn</a> and <a href="http://www.pixelmator.com/">Pixelmator</a>: Will the company spam you?</p>
<p>So far, I&#8217;ve been spammed by Pixelmator&#8217;s partners twice. I posted to their support board asking them if they were aware of this, and they deleted the post. I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.pixelmator.com/support/viewtopic.php?p=2596">posted the same question again</a>, on the grounds that maybe (just maybe) they deleted the post by mistake. It&#8217;s also possible they didn&#8217;t know about the spam runs. Still, it isn&#8217;t looking too good.</p>
<p>For those curious, why do I categorize it as spam?</p>
<ul>
<li>I never asked for the email.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s bulk.</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#8217;s other factors, too (like I don&#8217;t know the company that sent it) but in all honesty, those two are enough to categorize it as spam: It&#8217;s unsolicited commercial email.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Flying Meat has never spammed me.</p>
<p>Pixelmator has at this point eliminated themselves from the finals. Looking at the products, it makes me sad that one of them had to win this way. But there&#8217;s <strong>no way</strong> I&#8217;m buying something from spamtards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tewha.net/2007/11/acorn-vs-pixelmator-do-they-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1.6 billion spam emails</title>
		<link>http://tewha.net/2007/01/16-billion-spam-emails/</link>
		<comments>http://tewha.net/2007/01/16-billion-spam-emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sapmmers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southkorea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://objectsatrest.com/2007/01/16-billion-spam-emails/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A South Korean duo have been arrested for sending 1.6 billion spams between September and Deccember 2006.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A South Korean duo have been arrested <a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2173771/korean-duo-accused-sending">for sending 1.6 billion spams between September and Deccember 2006</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tewha.net/2007/01/16-billion-spam-emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam roundup</title>
		<link>http://tewha.net/2006/12/spam-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://tewha.net/2006/12/spam-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://objectsatrest.com/2006/12/spam-roundup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have some awesome spam subject lines today: Swarms of SUVs hunt for parking spots. I like the imagery of this. Unfortunately, it turned out to be a typical pump &#038; drop. Boring. ringworm frenzy This email wins the award &#8230; <a href="http://tewha.net/2006/12/spam-roundup/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some awesome spam subject lines today:</p>
<ul>
<li>Swarms of SUVs hunt for parking spots.
<p>I like the imagery of this. Unfortunately, it turned out to be a typical pump &#038; drop. Boring.</li>
<li>ringworm frenzy
<p>This email wins the award for &#8220;email with subject line most likely to turn me off of ever clicking it.&#8221; Seriously, the only way to turn me off more would be to throw a &#8220;rectal&#8221; in there somewhere. It appears to have the same origin as the first email, so apparently you either love or hate the subject lines.</li>
<li>Passover Hotline
<p>Another pump &#038; drop, although from a different source this time. This one made me wonder: What would a Passover Hotline do? Walk people through putting lamb blood on their doors, perhaps?</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tewha.net/2006/12/spam-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
